Diary of the Dead Walden Media

Diary of the Dead

Walden Media is the studio CREATING the film, while Fox is merely DISTRIBUTING it. One thing that never received much light was that the scriptwriters had turned in an early script that was close to the book and the Estate rejected it, because it didn t translate well to screen. So people, c mon, stop demonizing Fox. Just Queen, not High Queen says: I m confused! I heard that Narnia was 1 for DVD sales last week, at least for Barnes Noble, but I may be wrong about that. I hope it does better in sales. It s such a wonderful movie and Harry Potter has enough money as it is that they don t need anymore. Some places display/have VODT, some others don t. I m sure it s very complicated how it works. Here you don t see either SE LW W or PC, and no PC in general, occasionally LW W. Harry Potter is generally about. I m no expert. We got a cool DVD cover here but don t get the great Diary of the Dead packaging with the blueray. It s a good dvd/blueray release and would do really well over time i d say, not only for it but for previous two film dvd releases too, mainly SE s for purchases and singles for rentals. Okay, I just finished watching VDT, and although I started watching it with rock-bottom expectations, I ended it feeling that it wasn t as horrible as I thought it was going to be. The Lone Islands was a disgrace to Lewis writing. All the themes of the episode were tossed away in favor of a very rushed, badly written series of action scenes. There was no time to understand what was going on, or to care why it was happening. And there were no significant scenes with Gumpas, who in my opinion made a great minor villain. Some parts of the movie began to be well done but then they rushed on to the next scene, and there was no time to develop the good parts. If only the movie had been half an hour longer, and the added time had been taken right from the book, I think the movie could have been improved mightily. This is just a quickly written thing, and I m sure not many people will read it maybe I ll put a longer review in the proper review section, but in conclusion, I thought the movie was ok, pretty good, not as bad as I thought but it could have been so much better. Parts made me laugh, shiver, get excited, and think fondly about the book, but I wish there had been more good parts, that they d been developed more. I didn t even mind the green mist so much my main concern was that the scenes were rushed when they could have been taken so much further. It makes me sad, because I can just imagine what the movie COULD have been. This is my personal opinion, of course. I Diary of the Dead some people loved the movie and if you did, please don t yell at me for saying how I personally feel about it. I did like the movie better than I thought I would, especially the climax and the ending. I just lament that it was so short and rushed, and that the Lone Islands were chopped to pieces. I wish there was a chance to do a few things over. And by the way, my family has bought the movie, so we ve done our part to try to continue the series. Despite VDT s flaws, I am looking forward to seeing the Magician s Nephew IF it is ever made, although I would really rather see the Silver Chair just because I want to see Eustace again before he grows up. I agree about the Lone Islands, Starlily. Good analysis. I like the VDT film! And I look very much forward to the dvd coming out in my country. The Lone Islands scenes were disappointing, this is one of my favourite part of the book. And the film was a bit rushed at times. I loved Reep, though, and his relationship with Eustace. All in all a good film. Very good observations. I really hope they improve, but lets face it, the problem seems to be with the producer s choices of writers. I TOTALLY agree with you! I also think cutting the green mist out altogether would have left a lot more room to expand on the scenes that were actually true to the book.