Paul walker running scared part 1

Paul walker running scared part 1

Ill own both formats and Ive always been clear about that and quite honestly I dont know who will win. I champion HD DVD because both paul walker running scared part 1 were conceived primarily as a movie distribution format and HD DVD gives excellent HD quality for the lowest cost possible for all parties involved Production side and consumer side Blu-Ray is indeed a technological marvel but it is neither a fast optical format nor cheap and thats why I dont support it. Technological superiority should yield a noticable improvement in quality. Indeed it-HD DVD-has a lower cost on the production side, but claiming it does on the consumer side in one instance price of media, is entirely false, and in another instance price of hardware is very, very misleading. On the consumer side, price of media for Blu-ray and HD DVD is the SAME. As it pertains to hardware, the price of hardware is also the SAME, however, at this current moment, the hardware that will make it the SAME will not be out for another 4 months-the PS So, in general, as it stands currently and for only the next 4 months, HD DVD is indeed cheaper from a hardware perspective, BUT if you think 4 months is going to win a format war and solely based on cost, you are most certainly looking at this with a narrow perspective as content supportBlu-ray has more support, hardware support Blu-ray has more support, and industry supportBlu-ray has more support, are all variables that will come into the equation. As Ive been saying for a long, long time, cost does not trump all, especially when we are talking about an early adoption market. Blu-ray is a faster optical format than HD DVD, and again as far as cost goes from a consumers perspective, is the SAME on the media side and and is also the SAME on the hardware side when you look at what both sides are offering or are going to offer. However, Ill give you the fact that for the next 4 paul walker running scared part 1 HD DVD will be cheaper from a hardware perspective. Enjoy it while it lasts. Dfiler, to add to what Murch was saying in regards to ICT and how you will have the availability to watch HD over component, you wont have to be forced to to replace thousands upon thousands of dollars of equipment for no reason because you may keep all of your existing DVDs and enjoy them being upconverted as well. In addition, depending on what format you decide to go with, it should only cost you 499 and not thousands upon thousands with the availability of the HD-A1 from Toshiba or the PS3 from Sony. Marzetta7 is correct the price of pre-recorded media is infact very similar between the formats. Im please by this. Funny that people say cost does not trump all. It is a vast minority of products that can achieve critical mass as the more expensive platform. Sure there are small areas in which a more expensive competitor wins out but generally the rule is the item that costs the least has an advantage. 15 years of sales hasnt proven otherwise to me. The cheaper both formats go the better for me. Bring it on baby. Im saving for my 50 Sammy 1080p right now. Ill be a Blu-Ray bytch and a HD DVD Ho at the drop of a dime. Its all about the movies really. Ah, thanks for the heads up on delayed implementation of the image constraint token. I had missed the press releases where rumors of delayed ICT were confirmed officially. This is good somewhat. I had a DVD/divx player that used to upconvert over component. Then hollywood leaned on the manufacturer and it was disabled via a non-reversable firmware update. Arrrrgh, so much for ethernet based firmware updates being a good thing. Are there any HD-DVD players that upconvert copyprotected SD-DVDs over component? The toshiba and RCA doesnt as far as I can tell. Heck, maybe all our anti-ICT ranting has payed off a little.